Oracle診斷案例-Job任務停止執行Last Updated: Saturday, 2004-11-20 12:47 Eygle ; 昨天接到研發人員報告，數據庫定時任務未正常執行，導致某些操作失敗。 開始介入處理該事故.系統環境:SunOS DB 5.8 Generic_108528-21 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4 Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.3.0 - ProdUCtion1.首先介入檢查數據庫任務$ sqlplus '/ as sysdba'SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.3.0 - Production on Wed Nov 17 20:23:53 2004Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.Connected to:Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.3.0 - ProductionWith the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining optionsJServer Release 9.2.0.3.0 - ProductionSQL> select job,last_date,last_sec,next_date,next_sec,broken,failures from dba_jobs; JOB LAST_DATE LAST_SEC NEXT_DATE NEXT_SEC B FAILURESINTERVAL---------- --------- ---------------- --------- ---------------- - ---------- ----------------------------31 16-NOV-04 01:00:02 17-NOV-04 01:00:00 N0trunc(sysdate+1)+1/2427 16-NOV-04 00:00:04 17-NOV-04 00:00:00 N0TRUNC(SYSDATE) + 135 16-NOV-04 01:00:02 17-NOV-04 01:00:00 N0trunc(sysdate+1)+1/2429 16-NOV-04 00:00:04 17-NOV-04 00:00:00 N0TRUNC(SYSDATE) + 130 01-NOV-04 06:00:01 01-DEC-04 06:00:00 N0trunc(add_months(sysdate,1),'MM')+6/2465 16-NOV-04 04:00:03 17-NOV-04 04:00:00 N0trunc(sysdate+1)+4/2446 16-NOV-04 02:14:27 17-NOV-04 02:14:27 N0sysdate+166 16-NOV-04 03:00:02 17-NOV-04 18:14:49 N0trunc(sysdate+1)+3/248 rows selected. 發現JOB任務是都沒有正常執行，最早一個應該在17-NOV-04 01:00:00執行。但是沒有執行。2.建立測試JOBcreate or replace PROCEDURE pining ISBEGIN NULL; END;/variable jobno number;variable instno number;begin select instance_number into :instno from v$instance; dbms_job.submit(:jobno, 'pining;', trunc(sysdate+1/288,'MI'), 'trunc(SYSDATE+1/288,''MI'')', TRUE, :instno);end;/發現同樣的，不執行。但是通過dbms_job.run(<job>)執行沒有任何問題。3.進行恢復嘗試懷疑是CJQ0進程失效，首先設置JOB_QUEUE_PROCESSES為0，Oracle會殺掉CJQ0及相應job進程SQL> ALTER SYSTEM SET JOB_QUEUE_PROCESSES = 0; 等2~3分鐘，重新設置SQL> ALTER SYSTEM SET JOB_QUEUE_PROCESSES = 5; 此時PMON會重起CJQ0進程在警報日志中可以看到以下信息:Thu Nov 18 11:59:50 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 12:01:30 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=10 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 12:01:30 2004Restarting dead background process CJQ0CJQ0 started with pid=8但是Job仍然不執行，而且在再次修改的時候，CJQ0直接死掉了。 Thu Nov 18 13:52:05 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:09:30 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=10 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:10:27 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:10:42 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=10 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:31:07 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:40:14 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=10 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:40:28 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:40:33 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=1 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 14:40:40 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=10 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 15:00:42 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=0 SCOPE=MEMORY;Thu Nov 18 15:01:36 2004ALTER SYSTEM SET job_queue_processes=15 SCOPE=MEMORY;4.嘗試重起數據庫這個必須在晚上進行PMON started with pid=2DBW0 started with pid=3LGWR started with pid=4CKPT started with pid=5SMON started with pid=6RECO started with pid=7CJQ0 started with pid=8QMN0 started with pid=9....CJQ0正常啟動，但是Job仍然不執行。5.沒辦法了...繼續研究...居然發現Oralce有這樣一個bug1. Clear description of the problem encountered: slgcsf() / slgcs() on Solaris will stop incrementing after 497 days 2 hrs 28 mins (approx) machine uptime. 2. Pertinent configuration information No special configuration other than long machine uptime. . 3. Indication of the frequency and predictability of the problem 100% but only after 497 days.4. Sequence of events leading to the problem If the gethrtime() OS call returns a value > 42949672950000000 nanoseconds then slgcs() stays at 0xffffffff. This can cause some problems in parts of the code which rely on slgcs() to keep moving. eg: In kkjssrh() does 'now = slgcs(&se)' and compares that to a previous timestamp. After 497 days uptime slgcs() keeps returning 0xffffffff so 'now - kkjlsrt' will always return 0. . 5. Technical impact on the customer. Include persistent after effects. In this case DBMS JOBS stopped running after 497 days uptime. Other symptoms could occur in various places in the code. 好么，原來是計時器溢出了，一檢查我的主機:bash-2.03$ uptime 10:00pm up 500 day(s), 14:57, 1 user, load average: 1.31, 1.09, 1.08bash-2.03$ dateFri Nov 19 22:00:14 CST 2004剛好到事發時是497天多一點.ft.6.安排重起主機系統..這個問題夠郁悶的，NND，誰曾想Oracle這都成...Oracle最后聲稱:fix made it into 9.2.0.6 patchset在Solaris上的9206尚未發布...暈.好了，就當是個經歷吧，假如有問題非常不可思議的話，那么大膽懷疑Oracle吧，是Bug，可能就是Bug。7.FAQ一些朋友在Pub上問的問題Q:對于不同平臺，是否存在同樣的問題?A:對于不同平臺，存在同樣的問題因為Oracle使用了標準C函數gethrtime參考:http://www.eygle.com/unix/Man.Page.Of.gethrtime.htm使用了該函數的代碼都會存在問題.在Metalink Note:3427424.8 文檔中，Oracle定義的平臺影響為:Generic (all / most platforms affected)Q.計數器溢出，看了看job 中基本都是1天左右執行一次，假如設置 3 天執行一次的 job , 是否出問題的uptime 應該是 497*3 之后呢 ？ A:不會Oracle內部通過計時器來增進相對時間.由于Oracle內部hrtime_t使用了32位計數那么最大值也就是0xffffffff0xffffffff = 4294967295slgcs()是10億分之一秒，溢出在42949672950000000這個點上.注重，這里0xffffffff，達到這個值時，本來是無符號整型，現在變成了-1，那么這個值遞增時，+1 = 0了。 時間就此停住了。我寫了一小段代碼來驗證這個內容，參考：[oracle@jumper oracle]$ cat unsign.c#include int main(void){unsigned int num = 0xffffffff;printf('num is %d bits longn', sizeof(num) * 8);printf('num = 0x%xn', num);printf('num + 1 = 0x%xn', num + 1);return 0;}[oracle@jumper oracle]$ gcc -o unsign.sh unsign.c[oracle@jumper oracle]$ ./unsign.shnum is 32 bits longnum = 0xffffffffnum + 1 = 0x0[oracle@jumper oracle]$ 本文作者:eygle,Oracle技術關注者,來自中國最大的Oracle技術論壇itpub.www.eygle.com是作者的個人站點.你可通過Guoqiang.Gai@gmail.com來聯系作者.歡迎技術探討交流以及鏈接交換.原文出處:http://www.eygle.com/case/Job.Can.Not.Execute.Auto.htm